"Consensual
cohabitation between two adults of the same sex cannot in our understanding be
illegal far or less crime because its a fundamental right which is being
guaranteed to the person under article 21 of the Constitution of India, which
inheres within its ambit and it is wide enough in its amplitude to protect the inherent right of self-determination with regards to one's identity and freedom
of choice with regards to the sexual orientation of choice of the partner," Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma observed.
"Even
if the parties, who are living together though they are belonging to the same
gender; they are not competent to enter into wedlock, but still they have got a
right to live together even outside the wedlock. It would further be not out of a pretext to mention that a live-in relationship has now being recognized by the legislature itself, which has found its place under the provisions of
protection of women from Domestic Violence Act," the bench held.
The bench further remarked
that while deciding cases such as the instant one, the court should not engage
itself in social mores. It held that the right to liberty and freedom of choice
are "constitutional values" that cannot be abridged.
"…Social
values and morals they do have their space, but they are not above the
constitutional guarantee of freedom assigned to a citizen of a country. This
freedom is both a constitutional as well as a human right. Hence, the said
freedom and the exercise of jurisdiction in writ courts should not transgress
into an area of determining the suitability of a partner to marital life, that
decision exclusively rests with the individual themselves that the State,
society or even the court cannot intrude into the domain."
The court added,
"[It] is the strength provided by our constitution,
which lies in its acceptance of plurality and diversity of the culture. The
intimacy of marriage, including the choice of partner, which individually make,
on whether or not to marry and whom to marry are the aspects which exclusively
lies outside the control of the State or the Society."
0 comments :
Post a Comment